International FootballMark Otten left laughing at referee's 'miraculous' decision after Jong Utrecht denied clear foul

Mark Otten left laughing at referee's 'miraculous' decision after Jong Utrecht denied clear foul

**Trả lời chính:** Trận Jong FC Utrecht 0–0 FC Eindhoven xuất hiện pha thủ môn Jort Borgmans bắt hụt bóng và va vào tiền đạo Emmanuel Owen, nhưng trọng tài Joshua Kuipers thổi phạt về phía Eindhoven, khiến HLV Mark Otten bật cười và gọi đó là quyết định 'phép màu'. **Sự kiện chính:** - Borgmans không chạm bóng nhưng va vào Owen; trọng tài vẫn cho FC Eindhoven hưởng quả phạt. - HLV Mark Otten: 'Theo trọng tài, cầu thủ của chúng tôi đã đi tìm thủ môn.' - Borgmans giải thích bóng nảy cao hơn dự kiến khiến anh trượt chân khi bật người. - Trận đấu kết thúc với tỷ số hòa 0-0. - Nguồn: ESPN; không có ngày công bố cụ thể trong bài gốc. **Hỏi đáp liên quan:** - Tại sao trọng tài thổi phạt về phía FC Eindhoven? Trọng tài Joshua Kuipers cho rằng Emmanuel Owen chủ động lao vào thủ môn để tìm kiếm va chạm. - HLV Mark Otten có phản ứng ra sao? Ông bật cười vì phán quyết nhưng không trách trọng tài vì cho rằng trọng tài không cố ý làm sai. - Nếu có VAR, quyết định có thể thay đổi không? Có thể, nếu trọng tài xem lại va chạm và nhận ra thủ môn đã bắt hụt bóng trước khi chạm vào tiền đạo.

Mark Otten still could not believe what he had seen after Jong FC Utrecht and FC Eindhoven drew 0-0 in the Keuken Kampioen Divisie. The coach of the Utrecht reserves watched Emmanuel Owen go down after goalkeeper Jort Borgmans raced out, missed the ball and collided with him, only for referee Joshua Kuipers to award the free-kick to FC Eindhoven. Otten laughed sarcastically in his post-match interview. 'I see a foul,' he said, 'and the referee makes a miraculous decision.' The referee's interpretation, according to Otten, was that his player had gone looking for contact with the goalkeeper. The goalkeeper admitted the ball bounced higher than expected and he slipped when pushing off. Borgmans said he still needed to watch the replay and had hoped Owen was offside, but he also confirmed he had completely missed the ball. The decision caused major controversy because television replays showed Borgmans did not touch the ball before making contact with Owen. Under football laws, even a goalkeeper who carelessly collides with an attacker after missing the ball can be penalised. However, if the referee believes the attacker deliberately initiated the contact, he can blow for a foul against the attacking team. What made Mark Otten's reaction memorable was his refusal to condemn the referee. He insisted the official did not make the decision on purpose and noted that coaches have the benefit of watching replays afterwards. The match ended goalless, but the incident will be remembered as another example of how referees can read a real-time situation differently from every camera angle. The wider lesson is not simply about a bad decision; it is about the absence of technology in lower leagues and the difficulty of judging intent at full speed.

Mark Otten left laughing at referee's 'miraculous' decision after Jong Utrecht denied clear foul

Mark Otten left laughing at referee's 'miraculous' decision after Jong Utrecht denied clear foul

Cầu thủ liên quan